Institute for 21st Century Agoras

Dialogic Design Sociotechnologies for a Democratic Civitas

Menu
  • About Us
    • Executive Board
    • Staff
    • Agoras of the Global Village
      • DEMOSOPHIA Observatorium announced in Cyprus
      • Agoras of the Global Village Concept: ISSS 2003
      • Retrospective View of the Club of Rome Problematique
  • What We Do
    • Agora Reseach
      • Linking SDD as a methodology for Action Research
      • SDD in psychiatric therapy
    • Agora Training
      • 3rd International Facilitators Training School
      • Online University Credit Course, March 2011
    • Agora Tools
      • WebScope® Technology
      • Structured Dialogic Design CS I Software
      • Structured Dialogic Design CS II Software
        • SustainableFuturesStudent
  • Publications
    • Monograph series: A Social Systems Approach to Global Problems
      • V1: Strategic articulation of actions to cope with the huge challenges of our world today
    • The Talking Point
    • A Democratic Approach to Sustainable Futures
    • Co-Laboratories of Democracy (Harnessing Collective Wisdom)
    • Article Library
      • Publications from the AIO
      • Body Wisdom in Dialogue
  • Projects
    • Faith and Culture
      • Community Futures Planning
      • Indigenous leaders from the Americas and New Zealand
      • International Systems Institute — Systems Design
      • Urban Neighborhood Centers Alliance of Louisville (UNCAL)
      • Case Study Note: a church merger
      • Boundary Spanning Dialogue in Japan
    • Education and Workforce Training
      • Aligning for leadership inquiry _ Michigan Dept. Ed.
      • Great Lakes Area Regional Resource Center / Michigan Dept. Ed.
      • National Mental Health Association
      • NPSF amublatory Surgery
      • NPSF Drug Safety Perspectives
    • Civic Health and Wellness
      • Collaborative Solutions for Patient Assistance Programs
      • Future of Energy Efficiency in the Pacific Northwest
      • Invasive Species Control Program Planning
      • USDA Forest Service Priority Setting _ 2003
Menu

USDA Forest Service Priority Setting _ 2003

Forest Service Priority Setting for Fiscal Year 2003

The United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service utilized the professional services of CWA Ltd., an Interactive Management consulting firm, to collaboratively determine the priorities of the USDA Forest Service program of work for Fiscal Year (FY) 2003. This priority setting activity was conducted with a subset of the members from the National Leadership Team (NLT) and was part of the agency’s effort to improve its long-term accountability to both the Congress and the public.

The first-day workshop was dedicated to engaging the participants in sharing the meaning of 53 Annual Performance Goals for FY 2003. The participants also classified the Goals into nine affinity clusters. These clusters were very helpful in terms of the “transfer of meaning” from the strategic planning team to the NLT.

The second-day workshop was dedicated to ensuring that the NLT was able to understand and share the meaning of the original 53 Annual Performance Goals proposed by the strategic planning team. This “shared meaning” is critical in terms of the Agency capacity to fulfill its mission in accordance with its Strategic Plan. After internalizing the meaning of these 53 Goals, the NTL was invited to augment the list of Goals. They proposed 60 new Goals. Following a “focused and open dialogue” on the clarification of the meaning of all 113 Goals, the two teams were able to converge on 64 distinct Annual Performance Goals for FY 2003.

During the third-day workshop the NLT identified, through subjective and individual voting, the 23 Goals that were of higher relative importance. They subsequently engaged in a dialogue focusing on the mutual influences among the 23 higher priority Goals. Based on a majority opinion of participant judgments about the interdependence between pairs of Goals, and with the assistance of a robust computer-assisted methodology, an “Influence Tree” was constructed displaying diagrammatically those Goals that are at the roots of the tree as opposed to those that are at the branches. The three highest priority Goals (deepest priorities at the roots of the tree) are:

1) Agency offers a productive and learning work environment that values the contributions of all employees.

2) The skills of Forest Service employees are sufficient to meet the Agency needs and commitments for program delivery.

3) Execute the Agency’s financial management system to deliver timely, accurate, and reliable financial information.

A report on this project authored by A.N. Christakis, R.M. McDonald, and D.S. Conaway is available on request.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Posts

Heraklion DEMOSCOPIO

The Case for Citizen Think-Tanks

A Digital Approach to Democratic Dialogue

Systemic Barriers to Effective Societal Response to Terrorism

The Irony of the Predicament of Detroit

US EPA Taking Democratic Steps Toward Community Involvement

Policy is more than a product of process; policy is process itself

Hyperpartisanism: a consequence of mismanaged complexity?

Elinor Ostrom’s Legacy of the Commons

Planet under Pressure

Democracy as the Means to Discover the New Narratives for Sustainable Futures

What would a “national dialogue infrastructure” look like?

Reconnecting with the Club of Rome

Welcome to the Institute for 21st Century Agoras

Convening from Complexity to Action

About the Agoras Institute

Founded in 2002 by Aleco Christakis and Kenneth Bausch, the Institute for 21st Century Agoras is a globally networked non-profit organization dedicated to the democratic transformation of society and culture.

Practice Centers

Americans for Indian Opportunity
CWA Limited
Demosophia
Dialogic Design Int’l
Future Worlds Center
OCADU Strategic Innovation Lab

Search Archives

© 2023 Institute for 21st Century Agoras | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme