Institute for 21st Century Agoras

Dialogic Design Sociotechnologies for a Democratic Civitas

Menu
  • About Us
    • Executive Board
    • Staff
    • Agoras of the Global Village
      • DEMOSOPHIA Observatorium announced in Cyprus
      • Agoras of the Global Village Concept: ISSS 2003
      • Retrospective View of the Club of Rome Problematique
  • What We Do
    • Agora Reseach
      • Linking SDD as a methodology for Action Research
      • SDD in psychiatric therapy
    • Agora Training
      • 3rd International Facilitators Training School
      • Online University Credit Course, March 2011
    • Agora Tools
      • WebScope® Technology
      • Structured Dialogic Design CS I Software
      • Structured Dialogic Design CS II Software
        • SustainableFuturesStudent
  • Publications
    • Monograph series: A Social Systems Approach to Global Problems
      • V1: Strategic articulation of actions to cope with the huge challenges of our world today
    • The Talking Point
    • A Democratic Approach to Sustainable Futures
    • Co-Laboratories of Democracy (Harnessing Collective Wisdom)
    • Article Library
      • Publications from the AIO
      • Body Wisdom in Dialogue
  • Projects
    • Faith and Culture
      • Community Futures Planning
      • Indigenous leaders from the Americas and New Zealand
      • International Systems Institute — Systems Design
      • Urban Neighborhood Centers Alliance of Louisville (UNCAL)
      • Case Study Note: a church merger
      • Boundary Spanning Dialogue in Japan
    • Education and Workforce Training
      • Aligning for leadership inquiry _ Michigan Dept. Ed.
      • Great Lakes Area Regional Resource Center / Michigan Dept. Ed.
      • National Mental Health Association
      • NPSF amublatory Surgery
      • NPSF Drug Safety Perspectives
    • Civic Health and Wellness
      • Collaborative Solutions for Patient Assistance Programs
      • Future of Energy Efficiency in the Pacific Northwest
      • Invasive Species Control Program Planning
      • USDA Forest Service Priority Setting _ 2003
Menu

Community Futures Planning

Community-Based Co-Laboratory of Democracy

On January 11, 2003, thirty-four residents of the Bryn Gweled intentional community in Bucks County, PA, applied the Co-Laboratory of Democracy process offered by the Institute for 21st Century Agoras to define intentions for the future of their community. The session was sponsored by CWA Ltd. The Inquiry Design and Facilitation Team involved Tom Fetterman, a member of the community for over ten years, Ken Bausch, the Executive Director of the Institute, Diane Conaway and Aleco Christakis. The session took place in the Bryn Gweled Community Center.

In a one day working session, the community stakeholders generated and clarified 42 distinct intentions, such as:

* Restore the intentional diversity of the community.
* Learn to have fun together as a community.
* Encourage members to act on the saying “It takes a village to raise a child.”
* Develop effective ways of resolving disputes so that no one feels like a winner or a loser.

They subsequently selected those intentions that they thought were of higher relative importance. In the voting, 39 out of the 42 received one or more votes from the participants. The 5 most important intentions were:

* Make the transition from our early stage of growth to one of stewardship.
* Identify better ways to improve our decision-making process.
* Re-explore ideas to allow elderly members to remain on the Bryn Gweled Homestead.
* Re-unite less active members of our community with an invitation to participate anew.
* Use our past knowledge to enlighten our future planning.

In the afternoon, the stakeholders engaged in a strategic dialogue exploring the influences among the 12 intentions that received the most votes.

This influence pattern is a kind of “tree of meaning.” The intentions at the base of the tree are the most influential ones. In other words, if those intentions at the base of the tree were neglected, the community would be greatly handicapped in its efforts to accomplish intentions higher on the tree. The stakeholders were intrigued by the discovery of the most effective intentions, which were the following two:

* Use our past knowledge to enlighten our future planning.
* Identify ways to improve our decision-making process.

Shown above: interpreting the influence pattern. The implication of this discovery was that the Bryn Gweled community should focus its energy on meeting those two intentions. If it fulfills these two most influential intentions, it will be much easier for them to accomplish the other intentions higher on the tree. In looking at the map, it became clear to the participants that the intentions they voted most important were not the most effective for attaining their goals. This is a recurrent phenomenon when stakeholders use the Co-Laboratory of Democracy process.

The two other intentions that should be given serious consideration by the community, because of their positioning in the influence map, are:

* Identify ways to involve children in the decision-making process.
* Reunite less active members of our community with an invitation to participate anew.

By working on the four intentions mentioned above, the community will be able to make significant progress towards accomplishing all the other important intentions shown in the influence pattern.

The commentary at the end of the session was very positive, including statements by the stakeholders that the map made explicit and transparent their long tradition of decision making. The community has been using Robert’s Rules of Order for many years, and they appreciated the Co-Laboratory of Democracy dialogue, in the sense that it enables them to have a true dialogue instead of a debate.

Bryn Gweled Homesteads was created in 1940 to give 80 families enough land to raise their food. “Homesteading” is no longer practiced, and the community is now completely surrounded by Philadelphia suburbs. But Bryn Gweled has never lost sight of its founder’s dedication to cooperation, to environmentalism, and to racial, economic, and religious diversity. This Co-Laboratory of Democracy was called to reinvigorate processes dedicated to those ideals.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Posts

Heraklion DEMOSCOPIO

The Case for Citizen Think-Tanks

A Digital Approach to Democratic Dialogue

Systemic Barriers to Effective Societal Response to Terrorism

The Irony of the Predicament of Detroit

US EPA Taking Democratic Steps Toward Community Involvement

Policy is more than a product of process; policy is process itself

Hyperpartisanism: a consequence of mismanaged complexity?

Elinor Ostrom’s Legacy of the Commons

Planet under Pressure

Democracy as the Means to Discover the New Narratives for Sustainable Futures

What would a “national dialogue infrastructure” look like?

Reconnecting with the Club of Rome

Welcome to the Institute for 21st Century Agoras

Convening from Complexity to Action

About the Agoras Institute

Founded in 2002 by Aleco Christakis and Kenneth Bausch, the Institute for 21st Century Agoras is a globally networked non-profit organization dedicated to the democratic transformation of society and culture.

Practice Centers

Americans for Indian Opportunity
CWA Limited
Demosophia
Dialogic Design Int’l
Future Worlds Center
OCADU Strategic Innovation Lab

Search Archives

© 2023 Institute for 21st Century Agoras | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme